Truth Commissions and the Recognition of State Crime

Author: Stanley, Elizabeth

Source: British Journal of Criminology, Volume 45, Number 4, 1 July 2005 , pp. 582-597(16)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $35.78 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This article seeks to analyse the conditions by which state crime comes to be recognized or mis-recognized, particularly through truth commission proceedings. Truth commissions, established in transitions to democracy, often provide the most authoritative documents on state crime. While this recognition of state crime presents an opportunity to challenge popular perceptions and power relations, this approach is commonly detached from the linked imperative of social justice. Building on the work of Nancy Fraser (1997; 2000; 2003) and the author’s own primary research, the article details that while truth commissions expose a partial ‘truth’ of state crime, they inhibit recognition of status subordination that would allow a challenge to institutionalized patterns of inequality, discrimination and oppression.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi039

Affiliations: 1: University of Wellington, NZ;, Email: elizabeth.stanley@vuw.ac.uk.

Publication date: 2005-07-01

More about this publication?

The British Journal of Criminology: An International Review of Crime and Society is one of the world's top criminology journals. It publishes work of the highest quality from around the world and across all areas of criminology. BJC is a valuable resource for academics and researchers in crime, whether they be from criminology, sociology, anthropology, psychology, law, economics, politics or social work, and for professionals concerned with crime, law, criminal justice, politics and penology. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed articles, BJC contains a substantial book review section.