Reply to Cockshott and Cottrell
Author: Kliman, Andrew J.
Source: Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 29, Number 2, March 2005 , pp. 317-323(7)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract:
This note reaffirms the author's conclusion that measured pricevalue correlations have been tainted by the influence of industry size and are therefore spurious. Deflation of sectoral prices and values by costs destroys the correlation only because the theory in question is false, as the author's original paper proved deductively. Cockshott and Cottrell's results do not refute this proof. Deflation destroys the correlation between their simulated prices and values precisely because their simulation model assumes that the theory is false.Keywords: Labour theory of value; Price theory; Inputoutput analysis
Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei016
Affiliations: 1: Pace University
Publication date: 2005-03-01
- The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in 1977 in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, provides a forum for theoretical, applied, policy and methodological research into social and economic issues.
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Economics
- By this author: Kliman, Andrew J.

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert