Amendments and Corrections

Authors: Steinberg, David M.; Lin, Dennis K. J.

Source: Biometrika, Volume 93, Number 4, December 2006 , pp. 1025-1025(1)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$33.35 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More like this?
Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial

Abstract:

doi:10.1093/biomet/93.2.279

The paper included comparison of a 12-factor, 16-run design to randomly generated Latin hypercube designs and U-designs, with respect to the properties of their alias matrices. An error in a computer program led to incorrect computation of the properties of the alias matrix of the orthogonal design. A corrected version of Table 2 is provided here. The orthogonal Latin hypercube design still has better properties than the best of 100 random designs, but the differences are less striking than those in our original table.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1093/biomet/93.4.1025-a

Back to top

Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in
Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A