Amendments and Corrections
Authors: Steinberg, David M.; Lin, Dennis K. J.
Source: Biometrika, Volume 93, Number 4, December 2006 , pp. 1025-1025(1)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
The paper included comparison of a 12-factor, 16-run design to randomly generated Latin hypercube designs and U-designs, with respect to the properties of their alias matrices. An error in a computer program led to incorrect computation of the properties of the alias matrix of the orthogonal design. A corrected version of Table 2 is provided here. The orthogonal Latin hypercube design still has better properties than the best of 100 random designs, but the differences are less striking than those in our original table.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2006-12-01