5. Indeterminism and Antirealism

Author: Davidson, Donald

Source: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, September 2001 , pp. 69-85(17)

Publisher: Oxford Scholarship Online Monographs

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Gives an insight into the richness of Davidson's contributions to the realism–anti-realism debate, here with regards to the factuality of propositional-attitude talk. Davidson argues that anti-realism is best understood in epistemological terms, as a stance that commits ontologically in the light of what can be known. He concludes that, generally, one should not have anti-realist attitudes as understood here towards propositional attitudes and, in particular, argues that one does not have to give up belief in first-person authority, even if one accepts Quine's indeterminacy thesis.

Keywords: indeterminacy thesis; realism–anti-realism debate; Quine; anti-realism; epistemology; propositional attitudes; first-person authority; ontological commitment; factuality of propositional-attitude talk

Document Type: Research article

This article is hosted on another website.

You may be required to register, activate a subscription or purchase the article before you can obtain the full text.

Proceed

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A