2. “Extreme” Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative

Author: Shugart, Matthew Soberg

Source: Mixed-Member Electoral Systems, February 2003 , pp. 25-53(29)

Publisher: Oxford Scholarship Online Monographs

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This develops an argument applicable primarily to reform in established democracies, but potentially offering insight into choices in new democracies as well: that there are certain electoral systems that may be seen as extreme on one (or both) of two dimensions—interparty and intraparty. The interparty dimension refers to the degree to which, on the one hand, a single party forms a majority government on well under a majority of votes, or, on the other hand, coalitions are formed among several parties; the intraparty dimension refers to a continuum of electoral systems from those in which legislators depend exclusively on their own personal votes to those in which votes are given exclusively to parties such that legislators have no direct ties to voters. Suggests that electoral systems that are extreme on one or both of these dimensions are inherently prone to reformist pressures, and also shows that much of the appeal of mixed-member systems derives from how they appear to balance the extremes on each of these dimensions: the trade-off on the interparty dimension, which is between majoritarian and proportional forms of representation; and the trade-off on the intraparty dimension, which is between ‘strong candidates’ and ‘strong parties’. Brief studies are presented of five cases of reform from extreme electoral systems to mixed-member systems: New Zealand (formerly a pluralitarian system); Italy and Israel (formerly hyper-representative systems); Japan (formerly a hyper-personalistic system); and Venezuela (formerly a hyper-centralized system). The ideas presented in the chapter form the basis for the set of key questions presented to the authors of the country chapters in Part II of the book.

Keywords: Italy; interparty dimension; Japan; hyper-representative systems; New Zealand; Venezuela; Israel; electoral reform; hyper-personalistic systems; intraparty dimension; extreme electoral systems; hyper-centralized systems; majoritarian representation; proportional representation; strong parties; electoral systems; mixed-member electoral systems; strong candidates; pluralitarianism

Document Type: Research article

This article is hosted on another website.

You may be required to register, activate a subscription or purchase the article before you can obtain the full text.

Proceed

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A