Skip to main content

Chapter 29: Unproved and controversial methods and theories in allergy‐immunology

Buy Article:

$39.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Unproved methods and controversial theories in the diagnosis and management of allergy‐immunology are those that lack scientific credibility. Some definitions are provided for perspective because in chronic medical conditions, frequently, nonscientifically based treatments are developed that can have a very positive psychological effect on the patients in the absence of objective physical benefit. Standard practice can be described as “the methods of diagnosis and treatment used by reputable physicians in a particular subspecialty or primary care practice” with the understanding that diagnosis and treatment options are consistent with established mechanisms of conditions or diseases.3 Conventional medicine (Western or allopathic medicine) is that which is practiced by the majority of MDs, DOs, psychologists, RNs, and physical therapists. Complementary medicine uses the practice of conventional medicine with complementary and alternative medicine such as using acupuncture for pain relief in addition to opioids. Alternative medicine implies use of complementary and alternative practices in place of conventional medicine. Unproved and controversial methods and theories do not have supporting data, validation, and sufficient scientific scrutiny, and they should not be used in the practice of allergy‐immunology. Some examples of unproven theories about allergic immunologic conditions include allergic toxemia, idiopathic environmental intolerance, association with childhood vaccinations, and adrenal fatigue. Unconventional (unproved) diagnostic methods for allergic‐immunologic conditions include cytotoxic tests, provocation‐neutralization, electrodermal diagnosis, applied kinesiology assessments, and serum IgG or IgG4 testing. Unproven treatments and intervention methods for allergic‐immunologic conditions include acupuncture, homeopathy (“likes cure likes”), halotherapy, and autologous urine injections.

Keywords: Acupuncture; IgG; allergic toxemia; allergy‐immunology; controversial theories; cytotoxic tests; homeopathy; idiopathic environmental intolerance; provocation‐neutralization; unproved methods

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/aap.2012.33.3562

Publication date: May 1, 2012

More about this publication?
  • Allergy and Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists.

    The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma.

    Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.

    Articles marked "F" offer free full text for personal noncommercial use only.

    The journal is indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Science Citation Index Expanded, plus the National Library of Medicine's PubMed service.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Reprint Requests
  • www.AJRA.com
  • www.AllergyandRhinology.com
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
ocean/aap/2012/00000033/A00103s1/art00031
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more