Major Allergen Measurements: Sources of Variability, Validation, Quality Assurance, and Utility for Laboratories, Manufacturers, and Clinics

$39.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

The isolation and characterization of prominent allergenic proteins or glycoproteins is an important step in the development of allergenic extracts exhibiting improved definition, consistency, and clinical utility. Quantitative analyses specific for major allergenic components currently are being performed in numerous corporate and academic laboratories but have not been validated within or across laboratories in a systematic manner. In our laboratory, validation of double-bind (sandwich) ELISA assays for a diverse group of major allergens or extract components revealed a number of critical assay variables and reagent incubation conditions that directly influenced the precision, accuracy, specificity, and robustness of these tests. Data from ELISA methods for six allergens (Dermatophagoides farinae Der f 1, Alternaria Alt a 1, dog albumin, dog Can f 1, fire ant Sol i 3, and yellow jacket venom Ves 5) showed that up to twofold differences in results were observed when analysts or microplates were varied. Analyses of dog allergens using multiple reagents and concentrations indicated that twofold variations in results also can be produced by distinct combinations of materials or incubations from different assay steps. Data from Can f 1 and egg white analyses produced up to fivefold differences in antigen concentrations based on changes in the capture antibody source (mouse monoclonal versus rabbit polyclonal) or storage buffer. These results suggest that differences in major allergen concentrations reported by different testing laboratories may be related to assay differences as well as extract variations and raise questions as to the accuracy of major allergen concentrations and therapeutic dose recommendations reported at regional and national allergy meetings. Validated double-bind ELISA methods may be well suited for consistency monitoring and standardization of extracts provided that reference materials, reagent qualifications, and interlaboratory comparability are defined precisely.

Document Type: Regular Paper

Publication date: March 1, 2002

More about this publication?
  • Allergy and Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists.

    The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma.

    Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.

    Articles marked "F" offer free full text for personal noncommercial use only.

    The journal is indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Science Citation Index Expanded, plus the National Library of Medicine's PubMed service.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Reprint Requests
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more