If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Open Access Repeatability of food frequency assessment tools in relation to the number of items and response categories included

 Download
(PDF 129kb)
 
Download Article:

Abstract:

Background. Accuracy of measurement is a cornerstone of research in order to make robust conclusions about the research hypothesis.

Objective. To examine whether the number of items (questions) and the number of consumption responses (the coding used to measure the frequency of consumption) included in nutritional assessment tools influence their repeatability.

Methods. During 2009, 400 participants (250 from Greece, mean age 37 ± 13 years, 34% males, and 150 from Spain, mean age 39 ± 17 years, 41% males) completed a diet index with 11 items and binary (yes/no) responses, a diet index with 11 items and 6-scale responses, and 36-item and 76-item food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) with 6-scale responses. The participants completed these tools twice, with 15 days between the two administrations of the tools. The Spearman-Brown coefficient (rsb ), Kendall's tau coefficients, and the Bland-Altman method were applied to answer the research hypothesis.

Results. The highest repeatability coefficient was observed for the diet index with 11 items and binary (yes/no) responses (rsb = 0.948, p < .001), followed by the diet index with 11 items and 6-scale responses (rsb = 0.943, p < .001), the 36-item FFQ with 6-scale responses (rsb = 0.936, p < .001), and the 76-item FFQ with 6-scale responses (rsb = 0.878, p < .001). Statistical comparisons revealed no significant differences between repeatability coefficients of the first three tools (p > .23), whereas these three tools had significantly higher repeatability coefficients than the 76-item FFQ (p = .002). Subgroup analyses by sex, education, smoking, and clinical status confirmed these results.

Conclusions. Repeatability was found for all food frequency assessment tools used, irrespective of the number of items or the number of responses included.

Keywords: ACCURACY; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; METHODOLOGY; REPEATABILITY

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: December 1, 2012

More about this publication?
  • Established in 1978, the Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB) is a peer-reviewed journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation.

    The focus of the journal is to highlight original scientific articles on nutrition research, policy analyses, and state-of-the-art summaries relating to multidisciplinary efforts to alleviate the problems of hunger and malnutrition in the developing world.

    Food and Nutrition Bulletin's 2012 Impact Factor: 2.106
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more