If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Die Lehrfreiheit: Gefährdungen eines Grundrechts durch die neuere Hochschulrechtsentwicklung?

$33.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

The constitutional guarantee of the freedom of teaching as it is recognised in German and Austrian constitutional law (Article 5 paragraph (3) GG [= Grundgesetz, i.e. German Basic Law], Article 17 Austrian StGG [= Staatsgrundgesetz, i.e. Austrian Basic Law]) has always been characterised by a certain ambivalence: on the one hand, it is emphatically characterised as being "one of the highest forms of German spiritual life" and as "basic right of the German university" (Smend) and on the other, volatilisation in legal practice can be observed. The attempt to revitalise its normative content should break up the far too close interlink with the freedom of research and should accentuate the freedom of teaching as an independent basic right. In addition, the primarily subjective content of Article 5 paragraph (3) GG must be sharpened against institutional functionalist attempts at interpretation. On this basis, the freedom of teaching as an element of a multipolar normative structure of interests must be reconstructed by taking the duties that go with the civil service status and the students' "freedom to learn" into consideration.

In any case, official teaching quality assessment has to be qualified as an impairment of the freedom of teaching which needs justification if the surveys and ensuing analyses follow heteronomous standards. It meets with considerable constitutional concerns if – without duties having been violated by the tutor – it is linked with explicit sanctions. In contrast, private evaluation, for instance by the students themselves (e.g. 'MeinProf. de' = a website which translates 'my professor'), is an expression of the principally legitimate freedom of opinion.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/094802108785627869

Publication date: April 1, 2008

More about this publication?
  • Founded in 1968. Wissenschaftsrecht (WissR) endeavors to help university administrators, lawyers, judges, legislators, scholars and the interested public in understanding the legal and administrative problems of modern research and teaching at the university level. WissR offers analyses and evaluations of existing legal norms and proposed reform bills as well as of court decisions. WissR presents relevant materials not published elsewhere and reports regularly on all decisions pertaining to the subject.

    Language: German

    Seit 1968. Das Wissenschaftsrecht (WissR) möchte Praktikern der Universitätsverwaltung, Rechtsanwälten, Richtern, Parlamentariern und Wissenschaftlern helfen, die rechtlichen und organisatorischen Probleme moderner Forschung und Lehre imUniversitätsbereich besser zu verstehen. Das WissR bietet Analysen und Bewertungen von bestehenden Rechtsnormen, von Reformvorschlägen und von ausgewählten Gerichtsurteilen. Das WissR enthält wichtige Materialien, die sonst kaum zugänglich sind, und berichtet über die Rechtsprechung zu allen behandelten Themen. Das WissR erscheint vierteljährlich.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Recht - Wisssenschaft - Theorie
  • Jus Publicum
  • Geistiges Eigentum und Wettbewerbsrecht
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more