Between Convergence and Divergence: The CEFL Principles of European Family Law Zwischen Konvergenz und Divergenz: Die CEFL-Prinzipien zum europäischen Familienrecht

$33.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:


Comparative law is an instrument to realise certain aims. Also in the case of the Commission of European Family Law (CEFL), the comparative research that has been undertaken since 2001 serves a specific purpose. The main objective of the CEFL, which represents 22 European jurisdictions, is the creation of a set of Principles of European Family Law that are thought to be the most suitable for the harmonisation of family law in Europe. CEFL's work is purely academic and involves finding, analysing and comparing rules and then formulating and presenting non-binding Principles. In doing so, the CEFL assists legislatures in their efforts to modernise family law legislation. This contribution starts with some preliminary remarks regarding the terminology which is used. Then CEFL's working method is briefly addressed by providing an explanation of the »six-step method« and the »five approaches«. In this respect, there is a connection to the working method of the international and regional organisations, especially the European Commission, that adopt international or regional instruments which are aimed at unifying or harmonising the law. These organisations also face the same problems which must be addressed by the CEFL in the drafting of its Principles. In that sense the work of organisations having legislative competence is comparable with the CEFL project. Subsequently, the main body of the article provides information as to how the CEFL built further upon convergence and how it coped with divergence in its Principles of European Family Law in the field of Divorce and Maintenance between Former Spouses (2004) and Parental Responsibilities (2007). It goes without saying that comparative research requires scientific precision. In this respect the CEFL has tried to meet the necessary standards. In particular, a great deal of consideration has been given to the explanation as to why a certain Principle has been adopted. In this process, differences have been directly confronted rather than being disregarded. It is for outside observers to determine whether the CEFL has succeeded in this endeavour. In doing so, it should be kept in mind that its Principles are not part of an institutional design, nor do they claim to produce anything beyond a frame of reference.

Language: ger

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: April 1, 2009

More about this publication?
  • Founded in 1927. Areas of specific interest are comparative law and foreign law, the conflict of laws, the law of international transactions and the unification of law, including the law of the European Union.

    Die Zeitschrift wurde 1927 von Ernst Rabel als das deutsche Zentralorgan und Forum für die Grundlagenforschung auf den Gebieten des Privat-, Wirtschafts- und Verfahrensrechts in ihren internationalen Aspekten gegründet. Fachgebiete für alle diese Materien sind also die Rechtsvergleichung und das Auslandsrecht, das Internationale Privat-, Wirtschafts- und Verfahrensrecht sowie die Rechtsvereinheitlichung einschließlich des Europarechts.

    Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als Forum internationaler wissenschaftlicher Auseinandersetzung und geistigen Austausches mit der ausländischen Forschung. Sie publiziert grundlegende Aufsätze (in Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch) aus allen Arbeitsgebieten des Instituts, unter Einbeziehung des Wirtschafts- und Europarechts. Besonders beachtet werden die Übereinkommen, Richtlinien und Verordnungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften sowie die Übereinkommen der Haager Konferenz für IPR. Neue Gesetzestexte, Abkommen und rechtsvergleichende Entwürfe werden als Materialien abgedruckt und kritisch gewürdigt. Für die Besprechung der in- und ausländischen Literatur gibt es einen umfangreichen Rezensionsteil.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Studien zum auslandischen und internationalen Privatrecht
  • Beitrage zum auslandischen und internationalen Privatrecht
  • Jus Privatum
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more