A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft

Authors: de Queiroz Côrtes, Antonieta; Sallum, Antonio Wilson; Casati, Marcio Z.; Nociti, Francisco H.; Sallum, Enilson A.

Source: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Volume 33, Number 9, September 2006 , pp. 683-689(7)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

de Queiroz Côrtes A, Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr., Sallum EA. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 683-689. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00969.x. Abstract Aim:

Evaluation of the treatment of gingival recessions with coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADM) after a period of 24 months. Methods:

Thirteen patients with bilateral gingival recessions were included. The defects were randomly assigned to one of the treatments: coronally positioned flap plus ADM or coronally positioned flap alone. The clinical measurements were taken before the surgeries and after 6, 12 and 24 months. Results:

At baseline, the mean values for recession height were 3.46 and 3.58 mm for the defects treated with and without the graft, respectively (p>0.05). No significant differences between the groups were observed after 6 and 12 months in this parameter. However, after 24 months, the group treated with coronally positioned flap alone showed a greater recession height when compared with the group treated with ADM (1.62 and 1.15 mm, respectively -p<0.05). A significant increase in the thickness of keratinized tissue was observed in the group treated with ADM as compared with coronally positioned flap alone (p<0.05). Conclusions:

ADM may reduce the residual gingival recession observed after 24 months in defects treated with coronally positioned flap. In addition, a greater gingival thickness may be achieved when the graft is used.

Keywords: acellular dermal matrix graft; gingival recession; mucogingival surgery; root coverage

Document Type: Guest editorial

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00969.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Division of Periodontics, School of Dentistry at Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Publication date: 2006-09-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page