Benefit of “one-stage full-mouth disinfection” is explained by disinfection and root planing within 24 hours: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Quirynen, Marc; De Soete, Marc1; Boschmans, Geert1; Pauwels, Martine2; Coucke, Wim3; Teughels, Wim; van Steenberghe, Daniel1

Source: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Volume 33, Number 9, September 2006 , pp. 639-647(9)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Quirynen M, De Soete M, Boschmans G, Pauwels M, Coucke W, Teughels W, van Steenberghe D. Benefit of “one-stage, full-mouth disinfection” is explained by disinfection and root planing within 24 hours: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 639-647. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00959.x. Abstract Objectives:

The beneficial effects of the one-stage, full-mouth disinfection remain controversial in the scientific literature. This might be due to the fact that an entire mouth disinfection with the use of antiseptics has been confused with a full-mouth scaling and root planing. This parallel, single blind RCT study aimed to compare several full-mouth treatment strategies with each other. Material and methods:

Seventy-one patients with moderate periodontitis were randomly allocated to one of the following treatment strategies: scaling and root planing, quadrant by quadrant, at two-week intervals (negative control, NC), full-mouth scaling and root planing within 2 consecutive days (FRP), or three one-stage, full-mouth disinfection (FM) protocols within 2 consecutive days applying antiseptics to all intra-oral niches for periopathogens using as antiseptics: chlorhexidine (FMCHX) for 2 months, amine fluoride/stannous fluoride for 2 months (FMF), or chlorhexidine for 2 months followed by amine fluoride/stannous fluoride for another 6 months (FMCHX+F). At baseline and after 2, 4, and 8 a series of periodontal parameters were recorded. Results:

All treatment strategies resulted in significant (p<0.05) improvements of all clinical parameters over the entire duration of the study. Inter-treatment differences were often encountered. The NC group nearly always showed significant smaller improvements than the two CHX groups. The differences between the FRP or FM groups, and the two CHX groups only sporadically reached a statistical significance. Conclusion:

These observations indicate that the benefits of the “OSFMD” protocol are partially due to the use of the antiseptics and partially to the completion of the therapy in a short time.

Keywords: antiseptics; biofilm; disinfection; infection; periodontitis; periodontal therapy; translocation

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00959.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Periodontology, 2: Research Group for Microbial Adhesion, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 3: Laboratory for Statistics and Experimental Design, Faculty of Agriculture, Catholic University of Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A