Authors: Uter, Wolfgang; Becker, Detlef¹; Schnuch, Axel²; Gefeller, Olaf³; Frosch, PeterJ.⁴

Source: Contact Dermatitis, Volume 57, Number 5, November 2007 , pp. 337-342(6)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract:

Background: 

The proper reading of patch test (PT) reactions, based on morphological criteria, is of utmost importance. Digital images are increasingly used for medical training. Objectives: 

To assess the diagnostic validity of readings of 20 digital images of various PT reaction grades by congress attendants. Methods: 

122 volunteers took a PT quiz offered during the 8th ESCD meeting, September 2006, Berlin. No information on the respective allergen was given, nor the gold standard grading determined by an European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG) expert panel was disclosed while the quiz was open. Results: 

Overall, 63.5% of all ratings agreed `exactly' with the gold standard, and 87.8% `grossly', that is, with regard to the distinction between non-positive [doubtful or irritant (IR)] and positive (+, ++, and +++) reactions. Most images prompted a fair proportion of correct classifications. The distinction between doubtful and + and between +++, and strong bullous IR reactions proved partly difficult, probably because of blinding of the test substance. The least experienced in particular tended to misclassify IR reactions. Conclusions: 

The rating of digital images of PT reactions represents just 1 particular, isolated aspect of PT evaluation. Results were largely valid. Thus, the method could be used for continuing medical education, and for standardization in multicentre networks.

Keywords: contact allergy; continuing medical education; digital image; interrater agreement; patch testing; validity

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01236.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Mainz 2: Information Network of Departments of Dermatology at the University of Göttingen 3: Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen 4: Department of Dermatology, University of Witten/Herdecke and Klinikum Dortmund gGmbh, Germany

Publication date: 2007-11-01

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Dermatology
• By this author: Uter, Wolfgang ;  Becker, Detlef ;  Schnuch, Axel ;  Gefeller, Olaf ;  Frosch, PeterJ.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers