Contact Dermatitis

Nonanoic acid – an experimental irritant
pp. 117-123(7)
Authors: Wahlberg J.E.; Lindberg M.

Experimental systemic contact dermatitis from nickel: a dose–response study
pp. 124-132(9)
Authors: Jensen C.S.; Menné T.; Lisby S.; Kristiansen J.; Veien N.K.

A stronger patch test elicitation reaction to the allergen hydroxycitronellal plus the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate
pp. 133-139(7)
Authors: Heydorn S.; Andersen K.E.; Johansen J.D.; Menné T.

Quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis: uncertainty factors for mucosal exposures
pp. 140-147(8)
Authors: Farage M.A.; Bjerke D.L.; Mahony C.; Blackburn K.L.; Gerberick G.F.

Use of the local lymph node assay in the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of pharmaceutical process intermediates
pp. 148-154(7)
Authors: Durand G.; de Burlet G.; Virat M.; Nauman B.D.

Systemic acyclovir reaction subsequent to acyclovir contact allergy: which systemic antiviral drug should then be used?
pp. 155-157(3)
Authors: Vernassiere C.; Barbaud A.; Trechot P.H.; Weber-Muller F.; Schmutz J.L.

Tolerance of fondaparinux in a patient allergic to heparins and other glycosaminoglycans
pp. 158-159(2)
Authors: Ludwig R.J.; Beier C.; Lindhoff-Last E.; Kaufmann R.; Boehncke W-H.

Application of protective creams: use of a fluorescence-based training system decreases unprotected areas on the hands
pp. 159-160(2)
Authors: Kelterer D.; Fluhr J.W.; Elsner P.

Localized aquagenic urticaria: efficacy of a barrier cream
pp. 160-161(2)
Authors: Bayle P.; Gadroy A.; Messer L.; Bazex J.

Hand dermatitis in a student caused by Basic Red 46
pp. 161-162(2)
Authors: Chave T.A.; Nicolaou N.; Johnston G.A.

Occupational contact dermatitis, with asthma and rhinitis, from camomile in a cosmetician also with contact urticaria from both camomile and lime flowers
pp. 162-162(1)
Authors: Rudzki E.; Rapiejko P.; Rebandel P.

Chromate: still an important occupational allergen for men in the UK
pp. 162-163(2)
Authors: Balasubramaniam P.; Gawkrodger D.J.

Contact urticaria due to nitrile gloves
pp. 163-164(2)
Authors: Horn H.M.; Aldridge R.D.

Allergic contact stomatitis from paraformaldehyde and copal in a dental root canal filling
pp. 164-164(1)
Authors: Kimura M.; Miura S.; Ozawa S.; Kawada A.

Lymphadenosis benigna cutis induced by iatrogenic contact dermatitis from dinitrochlorobenzene
pp. 165-166(2)
Authors: Yoshida Y.; Duan H.; Nakayama J.; Furue M.

Occupational allergic contact urticaria and asthma from diphenylmethane-4,4-diisocyanatae
pp. 166-167(2)
Authors: Valks R.; Conde-Salazar L.; Barrantes O.L.

Occupational contact dermatitis and contact urticaria in veterinarians
pp. 167-168(2)
Authors: Valsecchi R.; Leghissa P.; Cortinovis R.

Very-low-voltage electrical injuries caused by cellular-phone chargers
pp. 168-169(2)
Authors: Kato A.; Shoji A.; Aoki N.

Airborne occupational allergic contact dermatitis from N,N-bis[2-bromo-ethyl] aniline and N,N-bis [2-[(methylsulfonyl)-oxy ]ethyl]aniline in a chemistry student
pp. 169-169(1)
Authors: Verlinden V.; Gloossens A.

Allergic contact dermatitis from polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether 350 in Solaraze^® gel
pp. 170-171(2)
Authors: Taibjee S.M.; Prais L.; Foulds I.S.

An isotopic response to patch testing
pp. 171-172(2)
Authors: Bell H.K.; King C.M.

Occupational contact dermatitis caused by a personal-computer mouse mat
pp. 172-172(1)
Authors: García-Morales I.; García Bravo B.; Camacho Martínez F.

3-Day Clinical Contact Dermatitis Course: 10–12 March 2004, Nottingham, UK
pp. 173-173(1)

Book Review
pp. 174-174(1)
Author: Rycroft R.J.G.