Skip to main content

Are immigrants at a disadvantage in psychiatric in-patient care?

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Lay B, Lauber C, Rössler W. Are immigrants at a disadvantage in psychiatric in-patient care?

Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005: 1–9. © Blackwell Munksgaard 2005. Objective: 

To assess the utilization of psychiatric in-patient care among immigrants, and to compare immigrants and natives with respect to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Method: 

Analysing a sample of 23 377 consecutive referrals to psychiatric hospitals of a catchment area in 1995–2001. Results: 

Within this sample, 20% were foreign nationals. Rates of psychotic disorders were similar in immigrants and natives. Regarding other diagnoses, sociodemographic and clinical measures, there were significant differences. Most immigrant groups had higher rates of compulsory admission, were more likely to be admitted with lower illness severity and not to be readmitted, and spent significantly shorter time in hospital, compared with Swiss in-patients. Some of these differences were clearly gender-specific. Conclusion: 

Service utilization and psychiatric treatment decisions are not explained merely by illness-related aspects in immigrants. Social and cultural factors have to be recognized in order to prevent disadvantages in psychiatric care.

Keywords: hospitalization; immigrants; mental disorders; mental health services

Document Type: Research Article


Publication date: May 1, 2005

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more