Skip to main content

Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

Buy Article:

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.


Objective: To review validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).

Method: A systematic search was performed in Medline and the Science Citation Index Expanded (ISI) from the period 1987–2000. For sensitivity and specificity of the EPDS presented in each study, 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated assuming prevalences of postpartum depression ranging from 5% to 20%.

Results: Eighteen validation studies were identified. The study design varied between studies. The sensitivity and specificity estimates also varied: 65–100% and 49–100%, respectively. The confidence intervals were estimated to be wide. Our estimates suggest a lower positive predictive value in a normal population than in the validation study samples.

Conclusion: Most studies show a high sensitivity of the EPDS. Because of the differences in study design and large confidence intervals, uncertainty remains regarding the comparability between the sensitivity and specificity estimates of the different EPDS versions.

Keywords: confidence interval; mass screening; postpartum depression; predictive value of tests; sensitivity and specificity

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Section of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 2: Department of Psychiatry, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo, and 3: Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Norway

Publication date: October 1, 2001


Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more