Pitfalls and challenges when assessing the depth of hypnosis during general anaesthesia by clinical signs and electronic indices
Abstract:The objective of this article was to review the present methods used for validating the depth of hypnosis. We introduce three concepts, the real depth of hypnosis (DHreal), the observed depth of hypnosis (DHobs), and the electronic indices of depth of hypnosis (DHel-ind). The DHreal is the real state of hypnosis that the patient has in a given moment during the general anaesthesia. The DHobs is the subjective assessment of the anaesthesiologist based on clinical signs. The DHel-ind is any estimation of the depth of hypnosis given by an electronic device. The three entities DHreal, DHobs and DHel-ind should in the ideal situation be identical. However, this is rarely the case. The correlation between the DHobs and the DHel-ind can be affected by a number of factors such as the stimuli used for the assessment of the level of consciousness or the administration of analgesic agents or neuro muscular blocking agents. Opioids, for example, can block the response to tactile and noxious stimuli, and even the response to verbal command could vanish, hence deeming the patient in a lower depth of hypnosis than the real patient state. The DHel-ind can be disturbed by the presence of facial muscular activity.
In conclusion, although several monitors and clinical scoring scales are available to assess the depth of hypnosis during general anaesthesia, care should be taken when interpreting their results.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Postoperative Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain, 2: Department of Anaesthesia, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium 3: Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain, and Consultant, Research Section, Danmeter A/S,
Publication date: 2004-11-01