"They can't read, but they sure can count": Flawed rules of the journal rankings game
Purpose ‐ The purpose of this short paper is to focus on the parallel games of journal rankings and citation counts. Design/methodology/approach ‐ The paper analyses journal ranking and citation procedures. Findings ‐ Journal rankings can often reflect personal bias, and therefore can be flawed. Originality/value ‐ The paper highlights the differences in ranking journals and citations, globally.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.