Web metasearch engines: A comparative study on search capabilities using an evaluation check-list
Purpose ‐ Metasearch engines (MSEs) which have been designed to solve problems of internet users in finding relevant resources are not seemingly as recognized as the other web search tools such as search engines (SEs) and directories. As a result, this paper aims to compare
and evaluate some of them in terms of search features included in their interface so that users can be familiar with these search tools. Design/methodology/approach ‐ This research compares and evaluates 20 general MSEs in English, which are free of charge, based on a researcher-made
checklist. Finally, those MSEs which have better search features have been introduced. Findings ‐ According to results obtained, it is self-evident that most MSEs offer an excellent alternative for users. Research limitations/implications ‐ MSEs which have great
features and high facilities are not necessarily user-friendly. So, usability studies or user-oriented ones on MSEs seem to be required. Practical implications ‐ Hopefully, these findings help users choose and make use of an MSE, MSE developers design more efficient and effective
ones and information professionals identify and retrieve high relevant documents, meeting their information needs. Originality/value ‐ This paper provides clear and relatively comprehensive descriptive evidence for evaluating search facilities and potentials of MSEs which are
commonly used by internet users today.