Knowledge-sharing hostility and governance mechanisms: an empirical test
Purpose ‐ This paper aims at further developing and empirically examining the concept of knowledge-sharing hostility. It seeks to analyze reasons for hoarding knowledge, reasons for rejecting external knowledge, and attitudes towards mistakes, as well as the influence
of these factors on actual knowledge-sharing behavior. The paper aims to examine how two specific knowledge-governance mechanisms ‐ commitment-based and transaction-based mechanisms ‐ affect knowledge sharing
Design/methodology/approach ‐ The authors test
the hypotheses on a sample of 1,639 respondents in 15 organizations in Denmark.
Findings ‐ The authors find that the use of transaction-based mechanisms promotes knowledge-sharing hostility by strengthening individuals' reasons for hoarding and rejecting knowledge, and
by negatively affecting individuals' attitudes towards sharing knowledge about mistakes. In contrast, the use of commitment-based mechanisms diminishes knowledge-sharing hostility among individuals.
Originality/value ‐ The contribution of the paper is two-fold. First,
it responds to the clear need to examine individual characteristics related to withholding knowledge in organizations. Second, by delineating specific organizational governance mechanisms that are critical for dealing with knowledge-sharing hostility, the research responds to the call for
research aimed at explaining and detailing problems that lie in the intersection of organization and knowledge processes.