IngentaConnect Gender differences in the predictors of police stress

Abstract:

Purpose ? The research compared the predictors of work-related stress for policemen and policewomen. Stressors included workplace problems, token status in the organization, low family and coworker support, and community and organizational conditions. Design/methodology/approach ? In 11 police departments, racial and ethnic minorities were oversampled. Of 2,051 officers sampled, 46.2 percent responded. Questions and scales were adapted from prior research on both males and females. Regression analysis revealed the strength of individual predictors of stress, the variance explained by workplace problems, and the additional variance explained by social support, token status, and community and organizational context. Findings ? Workplace problems explained more male's than female's stress. Regardless of gender, the strongest predictor of stress was bias of coworkers, and a weaker predictor was language harassment. Just for males, lack of influence over work and appearance-related stigmatization were additional predictors. Workplace problems explained gender differences in stress that were related to token status as a female. Research limitations/implications ? The sample was not representative of all police in the USA. Measures of community and organizational characteristics were highly intercorrelated, so they could not be examined separately. Especially, for women, there is a need to identify additional sorts of influence on stress. Practical implications ? Although individual interventions and coping strategies are important for reducing police officer stress, changes in the organizational context also deserve attention. There is a need to develop and test interventions to reduce bias among coworkers, to contain language harassment, and to provide police with an increased sense of control over their work. Originality/value ? The paper focuses on stress within the policing environment.

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.00 plus tax Refund Policy