Skip to main content

Accountability re-examined: evidence from Hull House

Buy Article:

$37.12 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Purpose ‐ The purpose of this paper is to re-examine accountability in a concrete historical context from the perspective of pragmatism and feminist theory. Design/methodology/approach ‐ An archival case study of Hull House. Findings ‐ Both pragmatism and feminist theory of Benhabib provide new insight into alternative conceptions of accountability, conceptions at odds with the prevailing and dominant emphasis on quantitative measures of performance. Further, this paper suggests that this limited view severely narrows the understanding of organizational "success." Research limitations/implications ‐ While this research serves to problematize notions of accountability further, it leaves the task of developing alternative practices to future researchers. Originality/value ‐ This paper contributes in two ways: first, there is a paucity of research linking pragmatism to the actual workings of concrete organizations. This paper begins to fill that gap. Second, this work draws the attention of accounting and other organizational researchers to the important role played by the settlement movement, and particularly Hull House, in the development of contemporary organizations.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Accounting history; Feminism; Non-profit organizations; Philanthropy; Pragmatism; United States of America

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2008-08-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more