Optimizing transport security risk analysis/emergency response preparedness

Author: Chollet, P.1

Source: Packaging, Transport, Storage and Security of Radioactive Material, Volume 20, Number 3, 2009 , pp. 108-110(3)

Publisher: Maney Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

The transport security is very important for AREVA group and the nuclear business in general. Because the transports are on the public field they are more sensitive for the persons and the environment. In order to optimise the AREVA group transport security and the effective implementation of nuclear safety charters the Business Unit Logistics puts in place in 2006 a specific organisation with a reinforced team and some new processes. The scope is the transportation of nuclear materials and contaminated equipment representing a specific risk to the group (safety, physical protection, industrial and media). The main BU LOGISTICS assignments are:

(i) to provide customised services to every BU of the group

(ii) to certify and control external subcontractors chosen with BU's consent

(iii) to supply all support for BU's in the field of:

(a) transportation preparation and organisation

(b) emergency management

(c) monitoring of regulations

(d) technical expertise associated with transportation.

This paper will introduce the approach of the risk analysis. The approach is in three steps:

(i) the transportation flow risk analysis

(ii) the Implementation priority

(iii) the proposal for corrective actions.

For risks analysis, we evaluate, for each transportation flow, the occurrence or probability of an event during transport and the consequence of any potential event. From this, we get a risk level for each transport flow. For the implementation priority, based on the risk level already evaluated in step (i), we evaluate and grade the current management of the risk. So, for each transportation flow, we have the risk level and the current level of the risk management. For the last part we propose corrective actions for priority flows.

Keywords: SECURITY; EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS; TRANSPORT SECURITY

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1179/174651009X449802

Affiliations: 1: TN International (AREVA group), 1, Rue des Hérons, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, 78054, France;, Email: annabel.potot@areva.com

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A