Switch Therapy in Full-Term Neonates with Presumed or Proven Bacterial Infection

Authors: Manzoni, P.; Esposito, S.; Gallo, E.; Gastaldo, L.; Farina, D.; Principi, N.

Source: Journal of Chemotherapy, Number 1, February 2009 , pp. 68-73(6)

Publisher: Maney Publishing

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This case-control study of full-term newborns with presumed or proven bacterial infection compared the efficacy, safety and tolerability of switch antibiotic therapy and traditional completely intravenous antibiotic administration. There were 36 newborns treated with switch therapy (i.v. ampicillin + sulbactam combined with i.v. amikacin for 3 days followed by oral cefpodoxime proxetil for 5 days); there were 72 full-term new-borns with the same characteristics as controls who received i.v. ampicillin + sulbac-tam combined with i.v. amikacin for 3 days followed by i.v. ampicillin + sulbactam alone for a further 5 days. The results showed that full-term newborns with presumed or proven bacterial infection initially treated with intravenous antibiotics can be switched to oral antibiotics after 3 days' therapy if physical and laboratory data indicate the disappearance of infection, thus significantly reducing the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit and significantly increasing breastfeeding, without having any negative clinical impact.

Keywords: neonatal infections; newborns; Switch therapy; cefpodoxime proxetil; bacterial infection; antibiotic therapy

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2009-02-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page