The challenges of community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) within the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC)

Authors: Amazigo, U.V.1; Brieger, W.R.2; Katabarwa, M.3; Akogun, O.4; Ntep, M.5; Boatin, B.6; N'Doyo, J.7; Noma, M.1; Sékétéli, A.1

Source: Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Volume 96, Supplement 1, March 2002 , pp. 41-58(18)

Publisher: Maney Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

The principal strategy adopted by the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), for the control of onchocerciasis in the 19 countries of Africa that now fall within the programme's remit, is that of community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI). Halfway through its 12-year mandate, APOC has gathered enough information on the main challenges to guide its activities in Phase 2. An analysis of reports and other documents, emanating from consultants, scientists, monitors and national and project-level implementers, indicates that there are three broad categories of challenge: managerial; technical; and socio-political. Under these three categories, this review identifies the most pertinent concerns that APOC must address, during Phase 2, to enhance the prospects of establishing sustainable systems for ivermectin distribution. The major challenges include: (1) maintaining timely drug-collection mechanisms; (2) integrating CDTI with existing primary-healthcare services; (3) strengthening local health infrastructure; (4) achieving and maintaining an optimal treatment coverage; (5) establishing and up-scaling community self-monitoring; (6) designing and implementing operations research locally; (7) ensuring the adequacy of community-directed distributors; (8) increasing the involvement of local non-governmental develop organizations in the programme; (9) achieving financial sustainability; (10) implementing equitable cost-recovery systems; and (11) engaging in effective advocacy. The implications of the challenges and suggestions about how they are being (or could be) addressed are also highlighted in this brief review, which should be of value to other programmes and agencies that may be contemplating the adoption of this unique strategy.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1179/000349802125000646

Affiliations: 1: African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), 01 B.P. 549, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso 2: African Regional Health Education Centre, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria 3: The Cater Center, Global 2000 River Blindness Program, Kampala, Uganda 4: Federal University of Technology, Yola, Nigeria 5: Groupe de Travail de Lutte contre l'Onchocercose (GTNO), Ministére de la Santé publique, Yaounddé, Cameroon 6: Onchocerciasis Control Programme in West Africa (OCP), Ougadougou, Burkina Faso 7: Programme de Lutte contre l'Onchocercose et la Cécité, Ministére de la Santé de la Population, Bangui, Central African Republic

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$51.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A