Being prepared to die for one's country has long been the touchstone of nationalism. But as the confused debates about Britishness have indicated over the last decade, concepts of national identity in the UK have been eroding fast and there is a growing uncertainty about what it means to serve one's country. The figure of the soldier is ubiquitous throughout the media, but the image of the flag-draped coffin remains a site of intense struggle, not just over the meanings of military sacrifice but also the perceived value of the war in which the individual soldier 'gave' their life. The response of different European electorates to the NATO-led ISAF operation in Afghanistan shows how governments can be vulnerable to the political risks inherent in committing their countries to war. Managing these risks entails controlling the representation of harm experienced not just by civilians (including torture and abuse of detainees) in the war zone but also by serving military personnel being deployed. Paying close attention to the figure of the soldier as a particular kind of worker-citizen can expose the hidden material and financial resources required to commit the country to war. It can also provide a focus for tracking the ideological energy involved both in securing public acquiescence and in marginalising opposition as a form of disloyalty to the national state.
More about this publication?
Soundings pioneers thoughtful, critical ideas on culture, society and politics. That's why leading left thinkers from Britain, Latin America, Asia, the United States and Europe debate their ideas in our pages.
'Deeply thoughtful about the public life of politics and the intimacy of our private lives and how they interconnect. Soundings is one of the few places where you read ideas which can change your mind.' Madeleine Bunting
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Open access content
Free trial content