The Laminar Boundary Layer over a Permeable Wall

Authors: Breugem W.; Boersma B.; Uittenbogaard R.

Source: Transport in Porous Media, Volume 59, Number 3, June 2005 , pp. 267-300(34)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

An analysis is given of the laminar boundary layer over a permeable/porous wall. The porous wall is passive in the sense that no suction or blowing velocity is imposed. To describe the flow inside and above the porous wall a continuum approach is employed based on the Volume-Averaging Method (S. Whitaker The method of volume averaging). With help of an order-of-magnitude analysis the boundary-layer equations are derived. The analysis is constrained by: (a) a low wall permeability; (b) a low Reynolds number for the flow inside the porous wall; (c) a sufficiently high Reynolds number for the freestream flow above the porous wall. Two boundary layers lying on top of each other can be distinguished: the Prandtl boundary layer above the porous wall, and the Brinkman boundary layer inside the porous wall. Based on the analytical solution for the Brinkman boundary layer in combination with the momentum transfer model of Ochoa-Tapia and Whitaker (Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 38 (1995) 2635). for the interface region, a closed set of equations is derived for the Prandtl boundary layer. For the stream function a power series expansion in the perturbation parameter kappa is adopted, where kappa is proportional to ratio of the Brinkman to the Prandtl boundary-layer thickness. A generalization of the Falkner–Skan equation for boundary-layer flow past a wedge is derived, in which wall permeability is incorporated. Numerical solutions of the Falkner–Skan equation for various wedge angles are presented. Up to the first order in kappa wall permeability causes a positive streamwise velocity at the interface and inside the porous wall, but a wall-normal interface velocity is a second-order effect. Furthermore, wall permeability causes a decrease in the wall shear stress when the freestream flow accelerates, but an increase in the wall shear stress when the freestream flow decelerates. From the latter it follows that separation, as indicated by zero wall shear stress, is delayed to a larger positive pressure gradient.

Keywords: boundary layer; permeable/porous wall; volume averaging; similarity solution; Falkner–Skan

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-004-2557-1

Affiliations: 1: Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics, J.M. Burgerscentrum, Leeghwaterstraat 21, 2628 CA, Delft, The Netherlands,

Publication date: 2005-06-01

Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page