Baumann on the Monty Hall problem and single-case probabilities

Author: Levy, Ken¹

Source: Synthese, Volume 158, Number 1, September 2007 , pp. 139-151(13)

Publisher: Springer

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Peter Baumann uses the Monty Hall game to demonstrate that probabilities cannot be meaningfully applied to individual games. Baumann draws from this first conclusion a second: in a single game, it is not necessarily rational to switch from the door that I have initially chosen to the door that Monty Hall did not open. After challenging Baumann's particular arguments for these conclusions, I argue that there is a deeper problem with his position: it rests on the false assumption that what justifies the switching strategy is its leading me to win a greater percentage of the time. In fact, what justifies the switching strategy is not any statistical result over the long run but rather the “causal structure” intrinsic to each individual game itself. Finally, I argue that an argument by Hilary Putnam will not help to save Baumann's second conclusion above.

Keywords: Monty Hall; Probability; Rigidity; Causal structure

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-006-9065-5

Affiliations: 1: Email: klevy2001@yahoo.com

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax Refund Policy