Author: Glanzberg, Michael

Source: Synthese, Volume 142, Number 3, February 2005 , pp. 289-315(27)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:


Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


A common objection to hierarchical approaches to truth is that they fragment the concept of truth. This paper defends hierarchical approaches in general against the objection of fragmentation. It argues that the fragmentation required is familiar and unprob-lematic, via a comparison with mathematical proof. Furthermore, it offers an explanation of the source and nature of the fragmentation of truth. Fragmentation arises because the concept exhibits a kind of failure of closure under reflection. This paper offers a more precise characterization of the reflection involved, first in the setting of formal theories of truth, and then in a more general setting.

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Massachusetts, Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, U.S.A., Email:

Publication date: February 1, 2005

Related content


Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page