The Doomsday Argument Adam & Eve, UN+ +, and Quantum Joe
Author: Bostrom N.
Source: Synthese, Volume 127, Number 3, June 2001 , pp. 359-387(29)
Publisher: Springer
Abstract:
The Doomsday argument purports to show that the risk of the human species going extinct soon has been systematically underestimated. This argument has something in common with controversial forms of reasoning in other areas, including: game theoretic problems with imperfect recall, the methodology of cosmology, the epistemology of indexical belief, and the debate over so-called fine-tuning arguments for the design hypothesis. The common denominator is a certain premiss: the Self-Sampling Assumption. We present two strands of argument in favor of this assumption. Through a series of thought experiments we then investigate some bizarre prima facie consequences backward causation, psychic powers, and an apparent conflict with the Principal Principle.
Language: English
Document Type: Regular paper
Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208306, Yale Station, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, U.S.A. E-mail: nick@nickbostrom.com Web: http://www.nickbostrom.com
Publication date: 2001-06-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Philosophy
- By this author: Bostrom N.

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert