Existential-Hayatological Theism
Author: Power, William1
Source: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Volume 61, Number 3, June 2007 , pp. 181-198(18)
Publisher: Springer
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
One of the oldest conceptions of theology is discourse of the poets about the gods and its philosophical interpretation. Judaism and Christianity borrowed this Greek understanding of theology and revised it only slightly to reflect its own monotheistic vision of God and God's relations to and with the world of nature and human existence. The question as to which philosophy best explicates and justifies the oral and written mythopoetic discourse of the imaginative bards of Israel and the early Christian community became a fundamental issue and has remained so through the centuries. The aim of this essay is to explore this question once again in the context of post-liberal theology in general, the works of Abraham Heschel, Claude Tresmontant, and the Japanese theologian Tetsaturo Ariga on an implicit biblical philosophy and the explicit metaphysical theism of Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne. The outcome of this exploration will be a rational reconstruction or ideal type of neo-classical theism or what I have chosen to call existential-hayatological theism.Keywords: Myth; Existential faith; Hayatology; Philosophical interpretation; God; Divine perfection; Neo-classical theism
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1007/s11153-007-9121-1
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help