Authors: Martin, Marie; Kosinski, Mark; Bjorner, Jakob; Ware, John; MacLean, Ross; Li, Tracy

Source: Quality of Life Research, Volume 16, Number 4, May 2007 , pp. 647-660(14)

Publisher: Springer

Abstract:

To compare the measurement properties of the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire [MHAQ], the SF-36^® Health Survey 10 item Physical Functioning scale [PF10], and scores from an item response theory (IRT) based scale combining the two measures.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (n = 339) enrolled in a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial completed the MHAQ and the SF-36 pre- and post-treatment. Psychometric analyses used confirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Analyses of variance were used to assess sensitivity to changes in disease severity (defined by the American College of Rheumatism (ACR)) using change scores in MHAQ, PF10, and IRT scales. Analyses of covariance were used to assess treatment responsiveness.

For the entire score range, the 95% confidence interval around individual patient scores was smaller for the combined (total) IRT based scale than for other measures. The MHAQ and PF10 were about 70% and 50% as efficient as the total IRT score of physical functioning in discriminating among ACR groups, respectively. The MHAQ and PF10 were also less efficient than the total IRT score in discriminating among treatment groups.

Combining scales from the two short forms yields a more powerful tool with greater sensitivity to treatment response.

Keywords: Computerized Adaptive Testing [CAT]; Item Response Theory [IRT]; Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire [MHAQ]; Quality of life [QoL]; SF-36

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9193-5

Affiliations: 1: Email: jbjorner@qualitymetric.com

Publication date: 2007-05-01

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Psychology
• By this author: Martin, Marie ;  Kosinski, Mark ;  Bjorner, Jakob ;  Ware, John ;  MacLean, Ross ;  Li, Tracy

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers