A Defense of Two Optimistic Claims in Ethical Theory
Author: Rachels S.1
Source: Philosophical Studies, Volume 112, Number 1, January 2003 , pp. 1-30(30)
Publisher: Springer
Abstract:
I aim to show that (i) there are good ways to argue about what has intrinsic value; and (ii) good ethical arguments needn't make ethical assumptions. I support (i) and (ii) by rebutting direct attacks, by discussing nine plausible ways to argue about intrinsic value, and by arguing for pain's intrinsic badness without making ethical assumptions. If (i) and (ii) are correct, then ethical theory has more resources than many philosophers have thought: empirical evidence, and evidence bearing on intrinsic value. With more resources, we can hope to base all of our moral beliefs on evidence rather than on, say, emotion or mere intuition.
Language: English
Document Type: Research article
Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0218, USA, E-mail: srachels@tenhoor.as.ua.edu

Click here for Page Help