Abstract:

In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: The University of Melbourne E-mail: gdjukic@unimelb.edu.au 2: The University of Adelaide E-mail: vladimir.popescu@adelaide.edu.au