A Critique of Langsam's ``The Theory of Appearing Defended''

Authors: Djukic G.1; Popescu V.B.2

Source: Philosophical Studies, Volume 112, Number 1, January 2003 , pp. 69-91(23)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: The University of Melbourne E-mail: gdjukic@unimelb.edu.au 2: The University of Adelaide E-mail: vladimir.popescu@adelaide.edu.au

Publication date: 2003-01-01

Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page