Emergence, Supervenience, and Realization
Author: Welshon, Rex
Source: Philosophical Studies, Volume 108, Numbers 1-2, March 2002 , pp. 39-51(13)
Publisher: Springer
Abstract:
In the first section of this paper, I articulate Jaegwon Kim's argument against emergent down ward causation. In the second section, I canvas four responses to Kim's argument and argue that each fails. In the third section, I show that emergent downward causation does not, contra Kim, entail overdetermination. I argue that supervenience of emergent upon base properties is not sufficient for nomological causal relationsbetween emergent and base properties. What sustains Kim's argument is rather the claim that emergent properties realized by base properties can have no causal powers distinct from those base properties. I argue that this is false.Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015755913389
Affiliations: 1: Email: rwelshon@uccs.edu
Publication date: 2002-03-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Philosophy
- By this author: Welshon, Rex

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert