When Can One Requirement Override Another?

Author: Rajczi A.¹

Source: Philosophical Studies, Volume 108, Number 3, April 2002 , pp. 309-326(18)

Publisher: Springer

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

I argue that any theory of moral obligation must be able to explain two things: why we cannot be thrust into a moral dilemma through no fault of our own, and why we can get into a moral dilemma through our own negligence. The most intuitive theory of moral obligation cannot do so. However, I offer a theory of moral obligation that satisfies both of these criteria, one that is founded on the principle that if you are required to do something, then you would be blameworthy for failing to do it. I conclude by relating these results to the current literature on moral dilemmas.

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: UCLA, Los Angeles, USA (presently at: Bowdoin College) E-mail: arajczi@bowdoin.edu

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax Refund Policy