IngentaConnect Why not Artificial Consciousness or Thought?

Author: Schlagel R.H.¹

Source: Minds and Machines, Volume 9, Number 1, February 1998 , pp. 3-28(26)

Publisher: Springer

Abstract:

The purpose of this article is to show why consciousness and thought are not manifested in digital computers. Analyzing the rationale for claiming that the formal manipulation of physical symbols in Turing machines would emulate human thought, the article attempts to show why this proved false. This is because the reinterpretation of `designation' and `meaning' to accommodate physical symbol manipulation eliminated their crucial functions in human discourse. Words have denotations and intensional meanings because the brain transforms the physical stimuli received from the microworld into a qualitative, macroscopic representation for consciousness. Lacking this capacity as programmed machines, computers have no representations for their symbols to designate and mean. Unlike human beings in which consciousness and thought, with their inherent content, have emerged because of their organic natures, serial processing computers or parallel distributed processing systems, as programmed electrical machines, lack these causal capacities.

Keywords: physical symbols; formal programs; neural networks; designation; interpretation; representation; semantics; intensional meaning; extensional meaning; causal capacities; emergence; levels

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax Refund Policy