IngentaConnect Explanation in Scientists and Children

Authors: Brewer W.F.¹; Chinn C.A.²; Samarapungavan A.³

Source: Minds and Machines, Volume 8, Number 1, February 1998 , pp. 119-136(18)

Publisher: Springer

Abstract:

In this paper we provide a psychological account of the nature and development of explanation. We propose that an explanation is an account that provides a conceptual framework for a phenomenon that leads to a feeling of understanding in the reader/hearer. The explanatory conceptual framework goes beyond the original phenomenon, integrates diverse aspects of the world, and shows how the original phenomenon follows from the framework. We propose that explanations in everyday life are judged on the criteria of empirical accuracy, scope, consistency, simplicity, and plausibility. We conclude that explanations in science are evaluated by the same criteria, plus those of precision, formalisms, and fruitfulness. We discuss several types of explanation that are used in everyday life –causal/mechanical, functional, and intentional. We present evidence to show that young children produce explanations (often with different content from those of adults) that have the same essential form as those used by adults. We also provide evidence that children use the same evaluation criteria as adults, but may not apply those additional criteria for the evaluation of explanations that are used by scientists.

Keywords: explanation; models; theories; children's explanations; philosophy of science

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, IL, U.S.A. 2: Department of Educational Psychology, Rutgers University, NJ, U.S.A. 3: Educational Studies, Purdue University, IN, U.S.A.

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax Refund Policy