@article {Lindstrom:June 2006:0022-3611:231,
	author = "Lindstrom, Per",
	title = "Remarks on Penroses New Argument",
	journal = "Journal of Philosophical Logic",
	volume = "35",
	year = "June 2006",
	abstract = "It is commonly agreed that the well-known Lucas&#8211;Penrose arguments and even Penrose's `new argument' in [Penrose, R. (1994): <I>Shadows of the Mind</I>, Oxford University Press] are inconclusive. It is, perhaps, less clear exactly why at least the latter is inconclusive. This note continues the discussion in [Lindstr&#246;m, P. (2001): Penrose's new argument, <I>J. Philos. Logic</I> <B>30</B>, 241&#8211;250; Shapiro, S.(2003): Mechanism, truth, and Penrose's new argument, <I>J. Philos. Logic</I> <B>32</B>, 19&#8211;42] and elsewhere of this question.",
	pages = "231-237(7)",
	url = "http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/logi/2006/00000035/00000003/00009014"
	doi = "doi:10.1007/s10992-005-9014-7"
}