Remarks on Penrose’s “New Argument”
Author: Lindström, Per
Source: Journal of Philosophical Logic, Volume 35, Number 3, June 2006 , pp. 231-237(7)
Abstract:It is commonly agreed that the well-known Lucas–Penrose arguments and even Penrose’s ‘new argument’ in [Penrose, R. (1994): Shadows of the Mind, Oxford University Press] are inconclusive. It is, perhaps, less clear exactly why at least the latter is inconclusive. This note continues the discussion in [Lindström, P. (2001): Penrose’s new argument, J. Philos. Logic 30, 241–250; Shapiro, S.(2003): Mechanism, truth, and Penrose’s new argument, J. Philos. Logic 32, 19–42] and elsewhere of this question.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Publication date: June 2006