Relevant Implication and the case for a Weaker Logic^\ast

Author: Brady R.T.1

Source: Journal of Philosophical Logic, Volume 25, Number 2, April 1996 , pp. 151-183(33)

Publisher: Springer

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

We collect together some misgivings about the logic {\rm R} of relevant inplication, and then give support to a weak entailment logic {\rm DJ^d}. The misgivings centre on some recent negative results concerning {\rm R}, the conceptual vacuousness of relevant implication, and the treatment of classical logic. We then rectify this situation by introducing an entailment logic based on meaning containment, rather than meaning connection, which has a better relationship with classical logic. Soundness and completeness results are proved for {\rm DJ^d} with respect to a content semantics, which embraces the concept of meaning containment.

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: Philosophy Department, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A