The Sovereign Event in a Nation's Law

Author: Motha S.

Source: Law and Critique, Volume 13, Number 3, 2002 , pp. 311-338(28)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This article interrogates the relationship between the sovereign event and a legal decision that purports to place sovereignty beyond law. It argues that sovereignty cannot be regarded as unitary, and elaborates the process of iterability by which the sovereign event is split from the outset. This dynamic is examined through an interrogation of the non-justiciability of sovereignty in Mabo v. Queensland (No. 2)(1992). Along with the unitary conception of sovereignty, Mabo (No. 2) deployed an absolute measure for community in the form of the `skeletal principle' of the doctrine of tenure. The paper argues that a conception of the political that affirms the One sovereign source of community and law instead of the original dis-position of law, nation and community repeats the original violence, and will, at best, run aground on the righteous (mis)recognition of the `appropriate savage'. It concludes with an indicative rethinking of community through the thought of Jean-Luc Nancy.

Keywords: aboriginal rights; Agamben; community; deconstruction; Derrida; foundation; law; Nancy; nation; native title; Negri; post-colonial; Schmitt; sovereignty

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: School of Law, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK, E-mail: s.motha@bbk.ac.uk

Publication date: 2002-01-01

Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page