@article {Jokic:2004:1382-4554:251,
	author = "Jokic A.",
	title = "Genocidalism",
	journal = "The Journal of Ethics",
	volume = "8",
	number = "3",
	year = "2004",
	abstract = "This is an attempt to develop a more complete understanding of &#096;&#096;genocidalism of commission,&#039;&#039; or the genocidal use of &#096;&#096;genocide,&#039;&#039; defined stipulatively as &#096;&#096;the energetic attributions of &#096;&#096;genocide&#039;&#039; in less than clear cases without considering available and convincing opposing evidence and argumentation.&#039;&#039; Genocidalism is a widespread phenomenon regarding the discourse on international affairs in the advanced, liberal societies of the West, embedding a &#096;&#096;normative divide&#039;&#039; between the ways of attending to domestic (national) concerns and ways of attending to international issues. I argue that genocidalism is morally wrong, explore its likely causes, and suggest possible ways of getting rid of this hateful practice.",
	pages = "251-297",
	url = "http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/joet/2004/00000008/00000003/05256293",
	doi = "doi:10.1023/B:JOET.0000031068.85984.da",
	keyword = "accountability, apologist narrative, genocide, genocidalism, ideological arrogance, international criminal tribunals, international law, normative divide, &#096;&#096;the Holocaust&#039;&#039;, universal jurisdiction, war crimes"
}