Moral Responses and Moral Theory: Socially-based Externalist Ethics

Author: Greenspan P.S.

Source: The Journal of Ethics, Volume 2, Number 2, 1998 , pp. 103-122(20)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The paper outlines a view called ``social (or two-level) response-dependency'' as an addition to standard alternatives in metaethics that allows for a position intermediate between standard versions of internalism and externalism on the question of motivational force. Instead of taking psychological responses as either directly supplying the content of ethics (as on emotivist or sentimentalist accounts) or as irrelevant to its content (as in classical versions of Kantian or utilitarian ethics), the view allows them an indirect role, as motivational props to moral teaching and thus to the general institution of moral discourse. However, they are not implied by any particular moral judgment (or speaker), so that amoralism comes out as possible. The response that defines the distinctively moral notion of ``wrong'' on this account is the second-level (social) response of forbidding some behavior; but this is ultimately to be understood in terms of (variable) individual reactions. Natural human emotion tendencies thereby constrain the content of ethics, while allowing for some degree of social variation in moral codes.

Keywords: emotion(s); ethics; externalism; internalism; metaethics; moral psychology; motivation; relativism; social norms

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7615, USA

Publication date: 1998-01-01