Coherence of Our Best Scientific Theories
Author: Park, Seungbae
Source: Foundations of Science, Volume 16, Number 1, February 2011 , pp. 21-30(10)
Abstract:Putnam in Realism in mathematics and Elsewhere, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975) infers from the success of a scientific theory to its approximate truth and the reference of its key term. Laudan in Philos Sci 49:19–49 (1981) objects that some past theories were successful, and yet their key terms did not refer, so they were not even approximately true. Kitcher in The advancement of science, Oxford University Press, New York (1993) replies that the past theories are approximately true because their working posits are true, although their idle posits are false. In contrast, I argue that successful theories which cohere with each other are approximately true, and that their key terms refer. My position is immune to Laudan’s counterexamples to Putnam’s inference and yields a solution to a problem with Kitcher’s position.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Division of General Studies, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Republic of Korea, Email: email@example.com
Publication date: 2011-02-01