Laws, Ceteris Paribus Conditions, and the Dynamics of Belief

Author: Spohn, W.

Source: Erkenntnis, Volume 57, Number 3, 2002 , pp. 373-394(22)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:


Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The characteristic difference between laws and accidental generalizations lies in our epistemic or inductive attitude towards them. This idea has taken various forms and dominated the discussion about lawlikeness in the last decades. Likewise, the issue about ceteris paribus conditions is essentially about how we epistemically deal with exceptions. Hence, ranking theory with its resources of defeasible reasoning seems ideally suited to explicate these points in a formal way. This is what the paper attempts to do. Thus it will turn out that a law is simply the deterministic analogue of a sequence of independent, identically distributed random variables. This entails that de Finetti's representation theorems can be directly transformed into an account of confirmation of laws thus conceived.

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Fachbereich Philosophie Universit├Ąt Konstanz D-78457 Konstanz Germany

Publication date: January 1, 2002

Related content


Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page