The Executive Veto: Purpose, Procedure, and Paradox
Author: Schwartz T.
Source: Constitutional Political Economy, Volume 10, Number 1, March 1999 , pp. 89-105(17)
Publisher: Springer
Abstract:
American governments, federal and state, leave a gap in legislative representation: global majorities are practically silent compared with local ones. An executive veto can right the balance. But prevailing procedural designs are fraught with paradox. I offer a simple new design that avoids paradox, can be instituted without constitutional amendment, and enhances both legislative and executive responsibility.
Language: English
Document Type: Regular paper
Affiliations: 1: Department of Political Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472, USA.
Publication date: 1999-03-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Economics , Law , Political Science
- By this author: Schwartz T.

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert