Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy and Essentialism – A Reply to MaryWinsor

Author: Stamos, David

Source: Biology and Philosophy, Volume 20, Number 1, January 2005 , pp. 79-96(18)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Mary Winsor (2003) argues against the received view that pre-Darwinian taxonomy was characterized mainly by essentialism. She argues, instead, that the methods of pre-Darwinian taxonomists, in spite of whatever their beliefs, were that of clusterists, so that the received view, propagated mainly by certain modern biologists and philosophers of biology, should at last be put to rest as a myth. I argue that shes right when it comes to higher taxa, but wrong when it comes the most important category of all, the species category.

Keywords: cluster classes; essentialism; history; species; taxonomy; Winsor

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-0401-9

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, Canada, M3J 1P3, Email: dstamos@yorku.ca

Publication date: 2005-01-01

Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page