The autonomy of functional biology: a reply to Rosenberg

Author: Lange, Marc

Source: Biology and Philosophy, Volume 19, Number 1, January 2004 , pp. 93-109(17)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:


Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Rosenberg has recently argued that explanations supplied by (what he calls) “functional biology” are mere promissory notes for macromolecular adaptive explanations. Rosenberg's arguments currently constitute one of the most substantial challenges to the autonomy, irreducibility, and indispensability of the explanations supplied by functional biology. My responses to Rosenberg's arguments will generate a novel account of the autonomy of functional biology. This account will turn on the relations between counterfactuals, scientific explanations, and natural laws. Crucially, in their treatment of the laws' relation to counterfactuals, Rosenberg's arguments beg the question against the autonomy of functional biology. This relation is considerably more subtle than is suggested by familiar slogans such as “Laws support counterfactuals; accidents don't.”

Keywords: Autonomy; Counterfactual; Explanation; Function; Laws; Reductionism

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599-3125, USA ( ), Email:

Publication date: January 1, 2004

Related content


Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page